Monday, 14 May 2018

Food Waste Bags Distribution

Food Waste Bags Distribution - This is a note from Fife Council on behalf of Fife Resource Solutions. I will add the details also to a separate page here on the Blog for easy access. Please note this began last week (7/5/18).

On behalf of Fife Council, Fife Resource Solutions (FRS) previously delivered 3 rolls of food waste bags every 12 months for all households with a brown bin collection service. 

Survey data from 2016 shows that over 25% of householders do not use food waste bags. In addition, the survey shows that a further 10% of households use less food waste bags than that provided by FRS. Therefore, the current method for distribution is both inefficient and ineffective. 

The Fife Resource Solutions Business Plan (2018-19) outlined a saving of £120,000 by stopping the direct delivery of bags to householders and providing them instead from Recycling Centres. 

Recycling Centre Distribution 

From 7th May food waste bags will be available from Recycling Centres in Fife. A self-service container is available at each Recycling Centre. Householders are asked to take up to 3 rolls of bags every 12 months. 

Customer Service Centres Trial 
Also, as a trial, food waste bags will also be available free of charge to householders at Kirkcaldy CSC (Townhouse) from 7th May (for 6 months). Householders can collect up to 3 rolls of bags per visit. Kirkcaldy was chosen as a trial as it was the first area to receive bags last year, and therefore where households are most likely to need a new supply. If successful, then this service could be rolled out to other Customer Service Centres. 

Posted food waste bags 
Food waste bags will be posted to householders if householders were missed during delivery of food waste bags last year (April 2017 - March 2018). Householders should call the Recycling Helpline on 03451 55 00 22. 

Other options 
Householders can continue to: 
* Use newspaper to wrap your food waste 
* Put food into the brown bin loose, especially dry foods such as bread 
* Buy food waste bags from other sources provided they carry the compostable symbol shown. This will make sure that the bags will compost in our Anaerobic Digestion Plant and create compost. This includes Leisure Centres in Fife and ONFife libraries (£1.30/roll) – site list at

Friday, 4 May 2018

Partnership Nurseries - Additional Hours 2020

Fife has 32 partnership nurseries - these are private nurseries, that as their name suggests, are in partnership with the Council.

Increased hours provision by 2020 - a policy decision of the SNP Government in Holyrood has to be enacted by local authorities. There will be an almost doubling of funded hours - from 600 to 1,140 for all 3 & 4 year olds and eligible 2 year olds. Unfortunately, as with many policy initiatives these are very top-down focussed. Local authorities are in the position whereby - decisions are made at Holyrood to be rolled out nationally and Councils have to enact the policy - often with little time, detail or, what appears to be, sufficient funding. 

Yesterday at the full Council meeting I asked the question of the SNP-Labour Administration:

"There are 32 partnership nurseries in Fife, what percentage of the increased hours provision does the Administration envisage will be provided by these nurseries?"

The response I was given was - 16%. Given that there is expected to be around 8,800 children who will be in recipient of the funded entitlement (Education & Children's Services Committee - August 2017) - the role of partnership nurseries is going to be of significance in providing this service. 

Figures provided by the Council in response to a request I made for further detail are as below:

3-4 year olds:
Fife Council - 79%
Playgroups/Private Nurseries - 16%
Childminders - 5%

2 year olds:
Fife Council - 78%
Childminders - 21%

Looking at the numbers it is clear that partnership nurseries are very much part of the Council's strategic planning for the additional hours. This led me to my supplementary question:

"By 2020 with the new service model this will include, partnership nurseries to "include paying the Living Wage". Those partnership providers I have spoken to have stated that their pay rates are in the most part in line with the Minimum Wage - which for over 25s is £7.83 as opposed to £8.75 for the Living Wage.

Given that under a Freedom Of Information request I made, it seems that of 202 place offered on the HNC Childhood Practice just over 60% of places have been filled - likely leading to an increased demand put on partnership providers to cover the additional hours. The question is - Will it be Fife Council or the Scottish Government who will make up this shortfall in wages to essential partnership providers?

If you note the second part of supplementary question - the Freedom of Information (FOI) request - this is where it become interesting. Since the Education & Children's Services Committee was presented with the information on the move towards a 1,140 hrs early years model the question I have asked, one more than one occasion, is - are we going to be able to deliver this? Increased accommodation and staff will be absolutely essential to its success.

Workforce planning and development is key to this. The Council notes:

The Scottish Government have completed some preparatory work regarding providing a competent workforce for 2020. It is estimated that in Fife Council we would need a further 400-500 Early Years Officers to deliver the additional capacity required. We expect all EYO staff to be qualified to HNC or SVQIII level in an appropriate qualification. There is currently a major shortage of suitably qualified staff to fulfil our additional requirements. 

An estimated 400-500 Early Years Officers (EYO) will be required to deliver this additional capacity. That is a huge increase in the workforce and in a very short period of time. I decided to submit a Freedom Of Information (FOI) request to Fife College to discover how their workforce planning on the HNC Childhood Practice - which will lead to becoming an EYO. The table below illustrates where the College is now in the first round:

Original Target 
St Brycedale
Grp A
St Brycedale
Grp B
Grp A
Grp B
Grp C
Grp A
Grp A
Grp B

The original target was 202 places - enrolment was 158 and the current number as of 1/5/18 is 123. Meaning that just over 60% of places have been filled. Now lets take that in conjunction with additional comment by the Council:
  1. Partnership agreements with other Early Learning and Childcare settings such as private nurseries, playgroups and childminders are an essential element to allow delivery of our model 
"An essential element" - in short, for the increased hours to have any hope of functioning as required partnership providers have to be on board. Leading back to my question - "Will it be Fife Council or the Scottish Government who will make up this shortfall in wages to essential partnership providers?" 

If partnership providers are essential to success of the policy they must pay the Living Wage and given the expected HNC role being much lower in year 1 than expected - is there a guarantee on who will pay this? Needless to say I was provided with a very opaque answer that insisted the funding will be available - Fife Council though the Scottish Government and this is built in as per agreements with COSLA. That though, is a simplification. 

Audit Scotland stated that Councils expect spend on the policy to have hit £1 billion by 2021-22 but the indicative Scottish Government figure is £840 million - a significant shortfall on local authorities who already have been baring the brunt of government cuts brought about by the SNP. The Scottish Government also claims to be on track with workforce planning - given the early figures in Fife I am very skeptical of this prediction. 

The National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA) conducted a survey which found that 97% of the 73 surveyed have not as yet adopted the Living Wage of £8.75 - Fife Council remember, insists that part of any arrangement is payment of the Living Wage. Those surveyed stated that to adopt the Living Wage would be dependent on the Scottish Government "substantially increased funding". Until that is forthcoming and guaranteed partnership providers in Fife, and around the country, are going to have an expectation to provide some of the funded entitlement with what does not look like an absolute guarantee that the Scottish Government is going to pay up the required amount. Any shortfall cannot be burdened on already stretched local authorities. 

Additional funding and realistic workforce planning are key to the success of this policy. What is unfortunate here in Fife is that due to this SNP-Labour coalition, a vocal Labour Party is non existent. It seems to be unable to question and scrutinise this SNP Government initiative (unlike the party at Holyrood which has done quite the opposite). Opposition politicians will though continue to do so.

One final point to note is that under the FOI a telling comment read: "Fife College did receive additional funding for this course, but unfortunately was unable to recruit to these places". Surprisingly (unsurprisingly?) the Administration in Fife chose to sidestep the point I made that college places may well be there but they need to be filled - as the data shows, this is not the case.

Tuesday, 24 April 2018

School Capacity - No Room At The School

This is just a short post (I have been extremely busy this past week with numerous meetings, chasing up ongoing issues and attending a policy conference - all of which I am wanting to write about later this week) on a rather surprising and disturbing account in a local newspaper last week. The article detailed the worrying narrative of a parent who was advised her son would not get a place in a Dunfermline high school following a placing request. 

The text of the letter written by myself and Cllr David J Ross can be found below. It is worth reminding readers that there is one final statutory consultation meeting to be held on rezoning proposals - that is on 23rd May at Inverkeithing High School. If you have not attended and this affects or concerns your child I would absolutely urge you to attend the final session.

I went to the presentation at Queen Anne High School this evening, which was relatively quiet - I think due to a larger turnout at the two previous ones. Having listened to parents ask officers questions I am still left feeling as I did before. It is not so much the rezoning proposals that are the issues, there is, in my opinion, more sense in this current proposal. It is the timing - the speed, the hurried approach I have been unhappy about. 

As I have stated on previous occasions, the rapid development of Dunfermline through extensive house-building around the Eastern Expansion was not something that no-one was aware of. Previous Council Administrations and Officers have been well aware there would eventually be a capacity crisis and a need to rejig zoning - therefore, this should have been a process that was done over a gradual period of time to cause the least impact on youngsters. I have heard far too many stories this past number of months of the emotional toll this lengthy process has taken and the confusion youngsters have felt when they have continued to be unsure of where they will attend high school. 
Getting It Right For Every Child (GIRFEC) is at the centre of education and that includes not only teachers, school support staff, social work and psychologists - it also includes elected representatives. This has to be kept in mind throughout this process. 

Dear Sir

We were shocked to read that a Dunfermline parent was advised her son would not get a place at Dunfermline High School following a placing request. At last month’s Education & Children’s Services Committee our group asked the question that if those affected families by the capacity crisis at Woodmill High School put in a placing request for another Dunfermline high school would it be granted? We were told, yes.

Therefore, it is very worrying to read that a family has had their placing request knocked back due to a failure by Fife Council over the past few years to recognise that such rapid house-building was going to lead to a crisis in school place availability.

It is also deeply concerning to read that Shelagh McLean describes those who won’t be able to attend Woodmill High School as having “the opportunity to attend Inverkeithing High School”. Is it an opportunity for a young person to be separated from their peer group and sent to a different school? Is it an opportunity to be sitting in April with only two months of primary school left and not know where you are going to high school? What sort of “opportunity” is this?

10,000 new homes will be built in Dunfermline and West Fife over the next two decades and we now have one high school at capacity (Woodmill) and another (Inverkeithing) that will be at capacity in four years if the revised rezoning proposals go ahead. Currently the only assurance we have is that a report will come to Committee in the Autumn that will shed some light on funding for new schools. None of this is of course of any good to those children who still don’t know what high school they will go to in four months.


Cllr Kathleen Leslie
Cllr David J Ross
Scottish Conservative & Unionist

Tuesday, 17 April 2018

Disabled Access - Burntisland Railway Station

Lack of accessibility on the northbound platform at Burntisland Railway Station was one of my election pledges. Simply put, in 2018 it is unacceptable that a railway station does not have disabled access for passengers joining or alighting from a train.

The current situation leaves wheelchair users and/or those with limited mobility having to plan their journey very carefully. Either they have to stay on the train until Kirkcaldy and then cross the platform via the lift and subway or exit at Inverkeithing, Aberdour or Dalgety Bay and take a (pre-booked) taxi back to Burntisland. 

I have written to Network Rail requesting a meeting. I am aware this is a long running issue (decades old) and I believe that it has to be looked at again. At this stage if you or anyone you know has had experience of using/attempting to use Burntisland Railway Station and you have mobility issues then please do get in touch. I have spoken with the local media about this to try and generate feedback too. 

Letter to Network Rail

Diversity & Inclusion
Network Rail Limited
1 Eversholt Street

15th April 2018

Dear Sir/Madam

Inclusive Rail Travel For All: Disabled Access, Burntisland Railway Station

I am writing in regard to the lack of disabled access on the northbound platform at Burntisland Railway Station, Fife. This platform is inaccessible to wheelchair users and is difficult to access for pram users and those with decreased mobility.

Whilst the southbound platform has had a ramp constructed to allow access, the only way to access the north side is via steps. Both researching and speaking with rail users I have been advised that wheelchair users and those with limited mobility should remain on the train until Kirkcaldy where they can cross the platform via lift and subway and then take a train back down the line to Burntisland and alight at the southbound platform, thus utilising the ramp. Alternatively, a disabled user could alight at Aberdour Railway Station and order a taxi to take them to Burntisland – again this means additional time has to be factored into any journey. 

Whilst I understand that passengers with a disability can book assistance at a station through the Passenger Assist system this is not always possible. Booking in advance means that a rail user who needs assistance loses out on any element of spontaneity in their journey. Whilst those without disability can do this it means that disabled rail users who decide to travel to or from Burntisland have to plan in advance.

I note that though your Access for All Fund an additional six Scottish stations have been added for upgrade, but this does not include Burntisland.

At this stage I would like to request a meeting with Network Rail to discuss accessibility and what progress will be made to ensure that Burntisland Railway Station has full disabled access on the northbound platform. Burntisland has three Ward councillors and I would envisage that all would like to meet with you and discuss this further.

Yours faithfully,

Friday, 6 April 2018

In Touch - NHS - Police - Ward Matters - Education

A belated Happy Easter, an update should have been on here at the beginning of the week but due to having to travel back and for to the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy I have been a bit limited for time. Suffice to say though, the patient is home and near recovered. Again, the dedication of NHS staff has to be praised. All the doctors and nurses went above and beyond (including answering my endless questions) and once again reinforced to me the value of the NHS in our society and that it is a service we can all be proud of. Which is of course why I am so outraged at the latest crisis to hit Fife – staff shortages have led to the closing of primary care emergency services at Dunfermline’s Queen Margaret, St Andrews and Glenrothes hospitals for three months. See link -

This is the result of eleven years of failure by the SNP Scottish Government to properly plan its workforce strategy which has left Scotland with a reduced number of doctors and nursing staff. In February Scottish Conservative MSP, Miles Briggs asked a parliamentary question on funding arrangements and it was revealed that the SNP is spending nearly £500,000 a day on agency staff – that is £171million a year – due to a lack of planning. Over a decade of mismanagement has led to an increasing reliance on agency staff, thousands of doctors leaving Scotland and figures indicating that within a few years there will be a shortage of over 800 GPs across Scotland. See Link -

In response to the closure of primary care emergency services, Scottish Conservative MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Murdo Fraser said: “The reduction in the out-of-hours footprint across Fife is concerning but not entirely surprising. Health boards across Scotland are struggling to find clinical staff to fulfil these roles and the Scottish Government has serious questions to answer over its lack of proper workforces planning.”

Damage to public services across Scotland is not of course only confined to the NHS; the merging of Scotland’s 8 police forces into the tumultuous establishment of the single Police Scotland, is still behest with crises. However, again I have to praise the hard-work and dedication of staff. A couple of weeks ago myself and a cross-party group of Fife Councillors (all parties were represented except the SNP on my visit – strange that…) visited the police control centre at Bilston Glen to learn more about the operational work of policing. I was particularly interested in attending as the themes that have come up time and time again in my Ward, community councils and TRA meetings are the lack of visibility of community police and 101 call responses.

Residents have continulously raised concerns about calling 101 and then a no-show from the police. Youth anti-social behaviour has been a long-running theme and whilst it is only a minority, the impact on local communities can be great with worry and stress. Confusion has also arisen as to whether to call 999 or 101. 

Councillors vocalised concerns about calls from all over Scotland being fed into a centralised system. We were assured that detailed mapping allows call handlers to have as much, if not more, knowledge on the ground than local officers had before the merging of the forces. Whilst I take on board aspects of the approach to feed all calls in centrally and then radio them back out to local police, I am as yet to be convinced that this is an effective alternative to the local bobby with the local knowledge. 

A Police Scotland Your View survey in late 2016 found that more than 40% of people who have dealt with the police over the previous 12 month period were unhappy with the response they got and two thirds said they felt crime in their area was on the increase. That view very much matches what I hear when out and about in my Ward – both at community meetings and when talking to residents. We need to keep these figures in mind alongside a police force themselves who clearly must be demoralised – 3159 left the forces since its creation in 2013 (as of December 2016) whilst the merging of the British Transport Police (BTP) with Police Scotland has been put on hold due, apparently, to IT system problems. Given the enormous concerns within the BTP at this controversial merger (which seemed to just be another move to power-grab by an SNP Government completely obsessed by centralisation of all public services) this delay is very much welcomed. See links -

Within the Ward this week it has been a little quieter than usual, probably due to the Easter holidays and people being away or busy during the school break. I attended the Kinghorn Chronicle Coffee Morning last Saturday where a new and exciting initiative called Kinghorn Support Squad was launched. The idea is to get a team of volunteers from the town who can help out a couple of hours here and there with different community projects. Not everyone has the time to join a local group or sit on a committee and KSS means you don’t have to! You sign-up and when a project needs assistance a call is sent out – if you can offer the skills and have a little time you can volunteer. It seems from the enthusiastic discussions on Saturday and at the Community Council that this is something the town is very much on-board with. I am looking forward to seeing what projects come up and where I can help out. If you are interested in helping out then email the Support Squad on:

Last week I had a letter in the Fife Free Press on the topic of Tenants & Residents Associations – their remit and how to establish one in your local area. Here is what I said, the letter is fairly self-explanatory as to what a TRA is and what an exciting and useful project it can be to a local area:

Dear Sir

Last week I was out with two different Tenants & Residents Associations, one long-running and the other newly-formed.

Invertiel TRA in Kirkcaldy has a fantastic group of residents who took councillors and Council officers on a walkabout highlighting areas of concern. I also had the opportunity to chat to some other residents we met whilst walking around the neighbourhood. Over the past number of months, I have been working with residents and the school to address a problem with littering around the viaduct. This has produced some positive outcomes and now, potentially, the opportunity to facilitate a long-term solution.

The newly established Central Burntisland TRA met with Fife Council representatives and councillors last Monday to lead us on an initial and informative tour of the area. Littering, dog-fouling, youth anti-social behaviour and lack of parking were all covered. These issues affect communities across Fife and tenant and resident associations are a fantastic way to draw attention to and work collectively to resolve. Being community-led means empowerment of local people who are the most informed on local issues.

Fife Council can support the establishment of a TRA, which is a voluntary organisation, and members decide the issues to focus on. Advice on deciding aims and objectives and applying for funding grants is also available. Ward councillors are usually quite keen to get involved and assist!


Cllr Kathleen Leslie
Scottish Conservative & Unionist
Ward 9 Burntisland, Kinghorn & Western Kirkcaldy 

Grit Bins
I have also had quite a bit of correspondence from residents on flooding on local roads, particularly the A921, the continued closure of the Loch Road and the general abysmal state of Fife’s roads.

The Kirkcaldy Members Meeting (not the Area Committee) met late last month and gritting and grit bins were on the agenda. Fife has 4,100 grit bins, of which they cannot afford to maintain all. It does also appear that the location and condition of them all is not quite so clear. A working group of Councillors has been looking at the development of a strategy on grit bins – a strategy because it appears that until now that has been lacking. In 1991 there were 1,500 bins with the criteria for them based on considerations such as altitude but by the early 2000s tracking appeared to have disappeared and anyone who requested a bin could get one. New developments also meant new bins. My major concern here is that Winter strategy appears to be based on “average” Winter conditions – that does not seem to factor in a Winter such as we have had. I am also concerned that when I was out and about in the icy conditions I found streets – such as those next to Burntisland Primary School had no grit on them at all. I just hope that this isn’t one of these issues that slips off the radar until the next icy Winter.

Education & Children's Services
The big topic at the Education & Children’s Services Committee was the decision to move to Statutory Consultation on the rezoning of schools in Dunfermline and West Fife. Comments on that can be found here –

Since the meeting it appears to have come to light that a parent who put in a placing request for Dunfermline High School has had it turned down and is being given “the opportunity” to instead attend Inverkeithing High School – I find that quite a concerning term to use. Opportunity is not a word I would ascribe to a mismanaged and hurried attempt to rezone, due to the poor planning on the part of the previous Administration to begin the process back when they realised that continued house-building in Dunfermline may just possibly lead to an increased population and therefore, a good few more kids…

My colleague Cllr David J Ross asked officers the question that if a placing request was put in for Dunfermline or Queen Anne would it be granted. He was given a one word answer – yes. Therefore, quite what is going on is uncertain and I will be emailing officers asking for clarification.

Also on the agenda was funding for voluntary organisations. My colleagues and I were concerned at the fact that the report was asking councillors to approve almost £4million in spending to various organisations which had a one line explanation as to what they would offer. Therefore, we tabled an amendment to the recommendations. It read:

Agenda Item 9 - “Committee requests this decision is deferred to the next E&CS Committee with a more-detailed report, outlining on all grants provided to voluntary organisations with a clear indication of how the money will be spent. Committee further requests that details be provided on all rejected funding requests.”

However, we did not have to put forward the amendment as the Convenor recommended that a report be brought to the next meeting providing, as we had asked, further detail.

We also tabled an amendment to Agenda Item 11:
“Committee requests a report on the Kirkcaldy pilot detailing the outcomes of this pilot prior to implementation across the seven localities. Committee further requests details of how the pilot has informed future direction of ABCD.”

This was in reference to what the Directorate is calling – A Better Connected Directorate (ABCD). The pilot was rolled out with Kirkcaldy schools in February. I only knew this due to sitting on the Education Forum where the notion had first been raised. The principles of it – providing more local collaboration make sense but the sticking point for us was that this was being moved from pilot to across all seven areas without feedback on the pilot. Again, though rather than take it to the amendment, where garnering cross-party support would be all but impossible I instead directly asked officers if we could have a report come back to Committee on the pilot and was advised, yes we could. Myself and my two colleagues were satisfied with the response and therefore, had no need to table the amendment.

One thing I have come to realise is that whilst Full Council may be a mud-slinging contest at times, committees tend to be where the real work gets done and there are ways and means of getting desired outcomes and getting some sort of consensus at a cross-party level.

I have real and serious concerns about attainment, curriculum, improvement collaboratives, ASN provision and cuts to further education places under this SNP Government,  but I also recognise that councillors in Fife are working on education matters that are specific to the local authority – those can include the school estate, attainment and achievement scores, the poverty-related attainment gap, what is a positive destination –  these are what locally elected members are focussing on. We can’t change national policy, much as many of would like to. However, we can work to ensure that Fife’s young people are all able to realise their full potential.

Trains – Stations - £5 off peak insult – delays of rolling stock
Yes, the Fife Circle saga (excuse the pun) rolls on. Long-suffering commuters in Fife were dealt a renewed insult last week when Scotrail-Abellio announced a £5 off peak ticket around Fife – from Edinburgh to Dundee as some sort of “compensation” – lets just read that again – a £5 off peak ticket. And that is helpful to the early morning commuter who has been affected by station skipping, cancellations and lack of carriages?... Read my comments here -

It is high-time the Transport Minister gets this mess sorted out. To add to the woes of Fife commuters, new Hitachi electric rolling stock that was to come into service in May has been delayed. This means that trains and carriages that were to be moved to Fife have now been delayed. My comments to the media sum-up my feelings – “It seems like Fife is at the bottom of the heap again”. Once again, do get in touch with me about your experiences of delayed trains, cancellations and stop skipping. More pressure needs to be put on Scotrail and the Scottish Government should be holding them to account, something that does not appear to be happening at the moment. Read the link here -

 If you have a matter you would like to discuss I can be contacted via:
Mobile: 07714778906

About Me